A case of too much power in a
too-little chassis
As much as we enjoy pure PC power in our gaming laptops, we
hate having to lug around big, hulking notebooks. Thankfully, this is something
AVADirect attempts to address with its latest Clevo laptop, the W230ST. Its
compact 13.3-inch gaming notebook chassis is crammed with impressive hardware,
including a quad- core 2.7GHz Core i7-4800MQ, GeForce GTX 765M, and 16GB of
RAM. While it may sound like you’re getting the best of both worlds,
AVADirect’s Clevo ends up biting off more than it can chew.
In terms of portability, AVADirect’s offering really does
pull through. Using the same 13x9x1.25-inch chassis as Digital Storm’s Veloce
reviewed in our December issue, it’s smaller than most other gaming laptops,
save for Razer’s 14-inch super-slim Blade notebook. And weighing in at less
than five pounds, we had no complaints lugging it around CES with us for an
entire week.
AVADirect Clevo W230ST
Aesthetically, the W230ST is generic. There is a small
AVADirect sticker next to the trackpad but no other branding. The lid's black
rubberized top contributes to the plainness, but at least gives it some grip
when carrying it with one hand.
While we love the notebook for its portability, its
performance is mixed despite its specs. The GTX 765M performed quite well and
managed from three to nine percent gains over our Alienware 14 zero-point
laptop, which uses the same mobile graphics card. When we turned to our CPU-centric
tests, though, it turned ugly. The AVADirect saw a 4 to 14 percent deficit
against the Alienware, which has a Core i7-4700MQ that’s clocked 300MHz lower
than the AVADirect’s CPU. It took the biggest beating in the multithreaded X264
HD 5.01 run. Even though the Core i7-4800MQ is spec’d to hit a max turbo of
3.7GHz, it’ll only sit there on light loads. On loads that push four threads,
such as our ProShow Producer test, it mostly hangs tight at 3GHz, where the
Alienware will chug along at 3.2GHz. The reason is thermals and the bigger,
thicker Alienware can quietly dissipate the heat while the AVADirect clocks
down and cranks up the fans. And that brings us to the next issue: noise.
AVADirect Clevo W230ST’s upside
Noise during multi-threaded loads is understandable, but the
fans often ran embarrassingly loud even when we were just browsing the web. To
make matters worse, the laptop’s speakers are quite weak and were often drowned
out by the fan. Battery life also let us down, with a disappointing two hours
and 45 minutes on video playback. On a gaming notebook it’s usually forgivable,
but the portability of the AVADirect carries an expectation of good battery
life.
Less offensive was its keyboard, which features chiclet keys
and white LED back-lighting. Its Synaptics trackpad is serviceable and we liked
how it had two separate dedicated buttons, though we found two- finger
scrolling horribly unresponsive on it. On the bright side, the notebook’s IPS
screen looks fantastic and offers excellent viewing angles (we wish more
vendors would choose the option).
AVADirect’s W230ST does have a lot going for it. In addition
to its awesome display, the notebook offers impressive GPU performance and is
very portable. At $1,557 it’s priced fairly, though if you intend to use it
just for gaming, we would suggest saving 80 bucks by going for 8GB of RAM
instead of the 16GB configured here, as that's still plenty for gaming. At the
end of the day, however, with its ho-hum battery life and annoyingly loud fan,
we can’t confidently recommend the W230ST without the buyer being aware of its
drawbacks.
AVADirect Clevo W230ST’s back
Specifications
·
Price: $1,557
·
CPU: 2.7GHz Intel Core i7-4800MQ
·
RAM: 16GB DDR3/1600
·
Chipset: Intel HM87
·
GPU: NVidia GeForce GTX 765M
·
Display: 13.3-inch, 1920x1080 IPS display
·
Storage: 120GB SSD; 750GB HDD
·
Optical Drive: N/A
·
Connectivity: Ethernet. VGA HDMI. all-in- one card reader. 3x
USB 3.0, 1x USB 2.0, headphone, mic, 2MP webcam, Bluetooth, 802.11n
·
1 Lap /Carry: 4 lbs, 10.6 oz / 5 lbs, 14.6 oz
Verdict
·
Pros: Good graphics performance; very portable; great display.
·
Cons: CPU performance is underwhelming; annoyingly loud, even
at idle.
·
Rating: 7/10
|