Our man crunches the numbers to
justify choosing petrol over diesel
Black or green? Or should that be silver or
blue? That was the choice I faced when we were offered a BMW 3 Series Gran
Turismo for our fleet. The silver car is a 318d diesel, while the blue one is a
328i petrol.
Seeing as 11 of the 15 cars in cars in the
Auto Express garage are diesels, a petrol somehow seemed more interesting to
me. The fact that the 328i cover 0-62mph in 6.1 seconds – that’s 3.6 seconds
quicker than the diesel had nothing to do with my decision. Honest.
BMW
is making a big deal about its new, downsized petrol engines
Also, BMW is making a big deal about its
new, downsized petrol engines. Not so long ago, choosing the 328i would’ve
meant a thirsty straight six. But today you’ll find a 2.0-litre twin-turbo
four-cylinder under the bonnet. Okay, it’s still not as economical as the 318d
(which does a claimed 62.8mpg), but the promises figure of 44.1mpg is acceptable,
considering the performance.
If you read Auto Express every week,
though, you’ll know that the cars on our fleet always fall shy of the
manufacturers’ claimed figures. In our experience, downsized petrol turbos are
among the worst offenders. So, to validate my choice of engine, I devised a
little experiment.
Eco
Pro mode help boost turbo’s economy
Before I took delivery of the 328i GT, we
had a 318d GT in the office to test. I drove it from London to my mother’s home
in the West Midlands, and over the 100-mile journey (which was mostly
motorway), I averaged 52.3mpg. For the return journey, I swapped into the 328i,
and as I arrived back in London, its trip computer read 44.8mpg.
I may have been a bit more tentative with
the throttle in the petrol car, subconsciously trying to justify my decision.
Also, I ran it in super-frugal Eco Pro mode. But that doesn’t matter, because I
had proof that the 328i GT could do what BMW said it would do.
I’ve calculated that over the course of six
months, covering an estimated 5,000 miles, choosing the petrol model should
cost me an extra $114. That’s a small price to pay for the far smoother,
quieter and faster car.
Mat
reckons petrol engine’s performance and refinement are worth the higher running
costs
Sadly, it’s not going to work out quite
that simple. As our spec panel (left) shows, our overall average economy in the
328i so far is not 44.8mpg, but 28mpg. The reason for this? After my initial
motorway economy run, the 328i was driven much harder for the following 600 miles.
And that’s the problem with these small turbo petrol engines: they can be very
frugal if driven sedately, but it’s almost impossible to resist thrashing them.
And when you do, they drink fuel at an alarming rate.
So, a quick recalculation of my running
costs based on the poorer fuel economy figure shows that choosing the petrol
car instead of the diesel is actually going to cost me an extra $711 over six
months. Maybe I didn’t go for the right-colored pump after all. Still, at least
I should have fun finding out…
Technical specs
- On fleet since: May 2013
- Price: $53,280
- Engine: 2.0-litre 4cyl, 245bhp
- CO2/tax: 149g/km/$210
- Options: 19-inch alloys ($1,185), adaptive suspension
($1,125), memory seats ($1,365), heat-up display ($1,200), met. paint
($915), Media pack ($2,985), sunroof ($1,732.5), reversing camera
($450), Visibility pack ($1,387.5).
- Insurance group: 36
- Mileage/mpg: 1,963/28.0mpg
- Any problems? None so far
|