Premium small cars that don’t measure up to
their price tags
Mix tighter personal budgets with a desire
for better fuel economy and the result is the Acura ILX and Buick Verano. These
new compact sedans let you enjoy an upscale interior and premium features
without the typically high luxury-car sticker price and fuel demands.
Acura
ILX Vs. Buick Verano on road test
Both have humble roots. The ILX is based on
the Honda Civic, the Verano on the Chevrolet Cruze. But even with the addition
of leather, sound deadening, and extra features, their sticker prices of
$30,095 and $27,750, respectively, seem too high for what you get, especially
for the Acura.
With
better gas mileage and a more spacious interior, the ILX edged out the Verano
in our tests, 77 to 73.
With better gas mileage and a more spacious
interior, the ILX edged out the Verano in our tests, 77 to 73. Its 150-hp,
2.0-liter four-cylinder engine returns a good 28 mpg overall, but on premium
fuel. The Verano’s 180-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder and six-speed automatic
transmission give it a slight performance advantage over the ILX, but a so-so
24 mpg overall. It does take regular gas, though.
Easy
opening: Doors lock by pushing a button on the handle and unlock as you
approach the car.
The cars deliver responsive handling, but
neither is sporty to drive. And ride quality doesn’t’ stand out in either. The
Verano’s almost library-quiet cabin is easily the car’s high point; the ILX
suffers from notable noise.
We
recommend the ILX, based on the Civic’s reliability record; based on our latest
survey;
Don’t let the high-end badges sway you. For
about the same money, you could buy a loaded four-cylinder family sedan, such
as a Hyundai Sonata or a Toyota Camry, with more room and similar or better
fuel economy. Or you could buy the higher-rated Acura TSX.
We recommend the ILX, based on the Civic’s
reliability record; based on our latest survey; the Verano has below-average
reliability.
How they compare
Competent but unexciting
Of the three available engines, our ILX has
the most popular one. It’s smooth and delivers adequate power, and the
five-speed automatic generally works well. For more zip, you can go for the
201-hp, 2.4-liter four and slick six-speed manual. More frugal-minded buyers
can opt for a 1.5-liter hybrid powertrain, with which we got 40 mpg overall in
the Civic Hybrid.
The
base engine in our Verano delivers decent performance.
The base engine in our Verano delivers
decent performance. Transmission shifts are prompt and smooth. A stronger
2.0-liter turbo four and a six-speed manual are also available.
Both cars have competent, although far from
sporty, handling and posted good speeds in our avoidance maneuver. Each
provides responsive steering but vague feedback to the driver. The ILX’s
steering is well weighted, but the Verano’s is overly light. The ILX has a
choppy ride; the Verano is better, but its 18-inch tires transmit some thumps.
Buick
Verano Crowded controls: it can be hard to quickly find the right dash switch
The interior are nice but fall short of
true luxury. The Acura’s controls are very simple, and the Buick’s dashboard is
more cluttered.
The
Acura’s controls are very simple, and the Buick’s dashboard is more cluttered.
The ILX’s spacious cabin has firm,
well-shaped, power-adjustable seats. The rear seat is roomy for a small sedan,
except for passengers more than 6 feet tall. The Verano’s interior is snugger,
with less driver room and front seats that have uneven support. The rear seat
is tight even for average-sized adults. The driver’s seat in both cars lacks
adjustable lumbar support, and the Verano doesn’t have a powered seatback
recline, omissions you don’t’ expect in a premium car.
The Buick has a slightly larger trunk and a
60/40-split folding rear seat; the Acura makes do with a folding one-piece
seatback.
Acura ILX tested vehicle
·
Highs: Fuel economy, powertrain, controls
·
Lows: Road noise, choppy ride, no
driver’s-seat lumbar support, value
·
Trim line: Premium
·
Drivetrain: 150-hp, 2.0-liter four-cylinder
engine; five-speed automatic transmission; front-wheel drive
·
Major options: None
·
Tested Price: $30,095
More test findings
·
Braking: Very good in wet and dry conditions,
with a firm pedal
·
Headlights: Optional low-beam HID lights and
halogen high beams provide very good illumination with high levels of
intensity.
·
Access: A low roof requires some bending. A
narrow doorway and wide sill makes rear access a bit snug.
·
Visibility: Very good, thanks to narrow roof
pillars up front. The high deck limits the view rearward. A rear-view camera
is optional.
·
Cabin storage: Large, deep glove box and
decent center storage.
·
Head restraints: The rear-seat center head
restraint is too low, even when raised, to provide protection.
·
Child seats: Removal of the rear-center
head restraint might be needed to fit a forward-facing child seat. Outboard
LATCH anchors are recessed.
|
All
or Nothing: the rear seat folds in one piece, limiting cargo and passenger
versatility.
Buick Verano Tested vehicle
·
Highs: quietness, transmission, braking
·
Lows: Front-seat comfort, tight rear seat,
narrow driving position
·
Trim line: Leather
·
Drivetrain: 180-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder
engine; six-speed automatic transmission; front-wheel drive
·
Major Options: Power sunroof
·
Tested Price: $27,750
More test findings
·
Braking: Excellent, with impressively short
stopping distances in dry conditions.
·
Headlights: Low beams have good intensity but
reach only a modest distance and have a sharp cutoff. High beams are more
intense and have very good reach.
·
Access: Easy to the front and rear
·
Visibility: Thick roof pillars, a high rear
deck, and large head restraints impede visibility all around. A backup camera
is not available.
·
Cabin Storage: Modest, with small cubbies and compartments.
·
Head restraints: The center-rear seat lacks a
head restraint.
·
Child seats: Infant-seat bases might be
hard to secure in outboard seats with belts. LATCH anchors are difficult to
reach and use
|
Leg-Room
Challenged: The rear seat is very tight, even for a small sedan.