Mitsubishi’s i-MiEV is
the most efficient car on the market. And, at #33,640 before tax incentives,
it’s also one of the cheapest electric cars. Unfortunately, the driving
experience reflects that fact. The i-MiEV is puny, tinny, slow, jounce, and
clumsy. Its interior never gets warm enough in cold weather. It seats only four
people, and they feel crammed together as in cheap theater seats. It also can’t
go very far on its long charge times. Overall, this low-priced EV is awfully
expensive for what you get.
Mitsubishi I-Miev
Although the i-MiEV
fulfills Its mission as an efficient and basic commuter and urban runabout, we
think most buyers would be better served spending a little more to buy a more
substantial electric car such as the Nissan Leaf or buying a cheaper hybrid car.
On a short leash.
The i-MiEV has a
smaller lithium-ion battery than other electric cars we’ve tested, which give
the car a typical range of just 56 miles in our experience. (The EPA rating is
62 miles). That’s about 20 miles less than other electric cars. A full charge
takes between 6 and 7 hours on a 240-volt charger or 21 hours on a standard
household outlet.
A full charge takes between 6 and 7
hours on a 240-volt charger or 21 hours on a standard household outlet.
Many of our drivers
noticed that the range indicator didn’t seem very accurate, but at least it
erred conservatively, showing less range than they were actually left with.
The car’s
63-horsepower electric motor delivers good response up to about 30 mph, but
beyond that it feels really sluggish. It recorded one of the slowest
0-to-60-mph acceleration times- 14.7 seconds – we’ve measured in recent years.
The car won’t coast
downhill normally because it’s recapturing regenerative braking energy. In “B”,
or braking, ode it’s possible to reach a stop without applying the brakes.
The car won’t coast downhill normally
because it’s recapturing regenerative braking energy
The i-MiEV’s ride is
awful, with harsh impacts. The car feels jumpy on uneven roads. And the ride is
choppy even on the highway.
In corners, the i-MiEV
feels clumsy, and the slow steering requires a lot of input and offers almost
no feedback. Ultimately, the car’s narrow width helped it thread our avoidance
maneuver quickly and securely. But it felt ungainly and did not inspire confidence
because the skinny font tires lost grip easily. At low speed the electric
motored whines loudly. As speed builds, tire and wind noise become louder.
the car’s narrow width helped it thread
our avoidance maneuver quickly and securely.
Chintzy interior
The cabin feels dated
and cheap. Almost all of the plastic trim is hard, several screw heads are
visible, and plenty of mold lines are evident in the trim.
Sitting up high makes
you feel less vulnerable, but the fixed steering wheel is too far away and the
pedals are too close, contributing to an awkward driving position. Plus the
seat doesn’t’ go back far enough.
Most controls are
simple, except for the radio and integrated navigation system, which has no
knobs and can be very distracting. Ridiculously, the navigation system displays
gas stations rather than charging stations. Bluetooth connectivity is standard.
This remote lets you heat the car while
it’s plugged in to avoid cutting into range.
Tested vehicle
·
Highs: Low energy consumption, zero emissions,
turning circle
·
Lows: Short range, long charging time, weak
heat, Spartan interior, acceleration, ride, agility, complicated radio,
headlights, driving position
·
Trim line: SE
·
Drivetrain: 63-hp electric motor; single-speed
direct drive; rear-wheel drive
·
Major options: Navigation, quick-charge port,
rear camera, battery warming system.
·
Tested price: $33,630
The i_MiEV line
·
Other trim line: ES
·
Base prices: $29, 125 - $31-125
More test findings
·
Braking: Stops are short, but the regenerative
brakes make the pedal feel touchy
·
Headlights: Weak low beams don’t’ shine far
enough. High beams are only slightly brighter, but they reach a good
distance.
·
Access: Easy to the front; more difficult to
the rear because of a narrow footpath.
·
Visibility: Feels like a fishbowl, but the
rear window is small.
·
Cabin storage: Modest; the glove box is about
the only available storage
·
Head restraints: all are sufficiently tall for
protection.
·
Child seats: difficult to fit in a car
so small. Rear belts might not secure rear-facing seats adequately
|