IT tutorials
 
Technology
 

Sharepoint 2013 : Configuring Monitoring in Central Administration (part 1) - Unified Logging Service, Configuring ULS via Central Admin

8/24/2013 4:58:47 PM
- Free product key for windows 10
- Free Product Key for Microsoft office 365
- Malwarebytes Premium 3.7.1 Serial Keys (LifeTime) 2019

Most of the monitoring configurations for SharePoint can be done via Central Admin under the aptly named Monitoring section, but some additional health and usage reports are provided as part of the Search Service Application (more on that later), and some settings are cleverly hidden only in PowerShell. Under the Monitoring section in Central Admin, the locations of the Health Analyzer and Timer Job sections are obvious; but for unknown reasons, the ULS configuration and Usage and Health Analysis settings are lumped together under the general Reporting heading. It’s like a Monitoring scavenger hunt that’s gone horribly awry.

Unified Logging Service

The lowest-level monitoring system is called the Unified Logging Service. This service records information about each operation that occurs inside of SharePoint, and it provides the most direct and detailed view into SharePoint’s operation. It gives insight into the processing of specific events and requests, regardless of whether or not an error was observed. The level of detail provided in the ULS logs, while of great value, can be both a blessing and a curse, as it can generate a large quantity of data to evaluate. However, with the right configuration and the right tools, you can strike a balance that provides the information you need without inundating you with mountains of irrelevant data.

If you are familiar with the ULS system introduced in SharePoint 2010, you will find that it is mostly unchanged in SharePoint 2013. The ULS engine can log events into both the Windows Event Log system and SharePoint’s own trace logs, with independent control available for the reporting level of each, but these are not simply two different channels for reporting the same data. The types of events typically sent to the Windows Event Log are critical errors (e.g., failure to connect to a database, service account errors) or general informational events (e.g., farm topology changes, search index replication status), whereas the entries made in the trace logs go much deeper, tracking the actions (and sometimes errors) of individual requests as they are processed.

Configuring ULS via Central Admin

Initially, the ULS appears to be very straightforward to configure, but you will quickly see that it is not quite so simple. First, you will look at the ULS configuration options inside of Central Admin. Here are the steps:

1. Browse to the Monitoring section of Central Admin.
2. Select Configure Diagnostic Logging.
3. You will see a screen like the one in Figure 1. The first block of settings, Event Throttling, enables you to select, for a large number of categories and subcategories, the least critical events to be sent to either the Event Log or the trace log.

FIGURE 1

image

As you expand the items in the tree, you will find that the ULS provides a nearly overwhelming amount of granularity for controlling the logging of various elements of SharePoint. Unfortunately, there is no built-in explanation of what exactly is included in any given category, and little or no documentation elsewhere on the topic. Some are fairly obvious (e.g., SharePoint Foundation ⇒ Alerts), while others wouldn’t necessarily mean anything to a systems administrator and might very well be made up (e.g., SharePoint Server ⇒ Command Base Validators).

Beneath the list of categories is a pair of drop-down menus used to select the least critical event to be reported to either the Event Log or the Trace Log. Note that the boxes do not use exactly the same severity settings, but rather each uses the severity nomenclature for its target log. Both boxes list the logging options in order of decreasing severity; therefore, the further down the list you go, the more verbose the ULS will be in its reporting. The most verbose options can be quite verbose. Before asking the ULS to give you more logging, be careful what you wish for, you just might get it. It’s a good idea to move down the list slowly, or select a few categories at a time. It is possible to crank the logging up so high that the overhead affects performance.

The check boxes in the category list allow you to set a specific severity level for multiple categories or subcategories simultaneously, but you cannot set multiple different severity levels simultaneously; every item checked is set to the values selected in the drop-down boxes. To set more than one severity value for various categories, you need to make your selections, click OK, and then return to Configure Diagnostic Logging for each severity level that you wish to set.

SharePoint 2010 introduced a great improvement over MOSS 2007 with the capability to easily set logging categories back to their default severity level, and that capability has been carried over to SharePoint 2013. (In SharePoint 2007 the only want to reset a category’s logging level was with STSADM, and there was no easy way to determine which categories were not at their default levels.) In SharePoint 2010 and SharePoint 2013, if any category’s logging severity level has been changed from the default, then the new value is displayed in bold text, making it obvious what has changed. Before SharePoint 2010, you could only see the currently set values; there was no indication whether that setting was the default.

The next option to look at on the page is the Event Log Flood Protection setting. The goal, of course, is to keep the farm running in an error-free state, but when SharePoint starts reporting errors, it becomes very chatty indeed. This isn’t really a problem for SharePoint’s trace logs, as we expect all errors to be reported there. Where it becomes problematic, however, is in the server’s event logs. These logs are used for the server’s own reporting and for other applications, so it would be rude for SharePoint to commandeer the logs and flood them with hundreds or thousands of identical error messages. In fact, such a log flood could actually make it more difficult to notice system-level error messages that might be the root cause of an issue. The Event Log Flood Protection option is enabled by default, which causes SharePoint to watch for repetitive error messages; when detected, it switches to creating occasional messages summarizing how many times the error has occurred and when it was last seen.

If you’re using any third-party monitoring tools that comb through your application logs looking for events, make sure they are capable of handling flood prevention. Otherwise, they may not recognize a problem if one exists.

Moving right along, we come to the Trace Log configuration options. These options are, for the most part, self-explanatory, but that is not to say that some thought shouldn’t be put into them. The first option is the path for storing the logs. By default it is set to %CommonProgramFiles%\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\LOGS\, which is typically the C:\ drive of the SharePoint server(s). It is recommended that you change this path to a drive other than the system drive to avoid the possibility of the log files growing to the point of exhausting the system drive’s free space. Windows gets very upset if the boot drive runs out of space — and if Windows ain’t happy, nobody’s happy.

However, two points must be considered when relocating the trace logs. First, the path specified must exist on all servers that are members of the farm. This is easy enough to ensure when the farm is set up, but you must also consider whether any additional servers may be added to the farm, as they too must have the same path available. When you move your logs, don’t try to be overly clever with the new path. If they’re in the same path as the 15 hive but on a different drive, they’re very easy for other administrators to find. Conversely, if they’re buried under E:\Logs\SharePoint Logs\ULS Logs\ they’re tougher to find without looking for their location in Central Admin or PowerShell. E:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\Logs might be a mouthful, but it’s a very obvious place to look if there are no ULS logs on the C drive. Second, the writing of the trace logs can potentially be a very disk I/O-intensive operation, so it is important to ensure that you don’t slow down SharePoint by putting the logs on excessively slow storage, and that you don’t inadvertently slow down other applications that might be running off the same drive you select for your trace logs.

Following the trace log path setting are two options controlling retention for the logs, according to both age and total space consumed. By default, the logs are retained for 14 days and the option to restrict log disk space usage is disabled. However, note that the box for specifying maximum storage size uses GB as its unit of measure; therefore, if you enable the size restriction without changing the size value, you have effectively just configured a “restriction” of 1TB! When processing log retention, SharePoint uses the more restrictive of the two configurations to determine which files to keep and which to delete. For instance, if you set a retention age of 10 days and a maximum storage space of 5GB, SharePoint will delete logs older than 10 days even if the 5GB limit hasn’t been reached; conversely, it will delete the oldest logs if the 5GB limit is exceeded, even if those logs are younger than 10 days old. Figure 2 shows the Restriction Settings page.

FIGURE 2

image
 
Others
 
- InfoPath with SharePoint 2010 : Using Template Parts to Create Reusable Form Components (part 3)
- InfoPath with SharePoint 2010 : Using Template Parts to Create Reusable Form Components (part 2) - Add Your Template Part as a Custom Control
- InfoPath with SharePoint 2010 : Using Template Parts to Create Reusable Form Components (part 1)
- SQL Server 2008 R2 : Database Design and Performance - RAID Technology
- SQL Server 2008 R2 : Database Filegroups and Performance, SQL Server and SAN Technology
- SQL Server 2008 R2 : Database Design and Performance - Denormalizing a Database - Essential Denormalization Techniques
- SQL Server 2008 R2 : Basic Tenets of Designing for Performance, Logical Database Design Issues
- SQL Server 2008 R2 : Database Snapshots - Setting Up Snapshots Against a Database Mirror
- SQL Server 2008 R2 : Query Versus Update Performance , Identifying Missing Indexes
- SQL Server 2008 R2 : Query Versus Update Performance , Identifying Missing Indexes
 
 
Top 10
 
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Finding containers and lists in Visio (part 2) - Wireframes,Legends
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Finding containers and lists in Visio (part 1) - Swimlanes
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Formatting and sizing lists
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Adding shapes to lists
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Adding Structure to Your Diagrams - Sizing containers
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 3) - The Other Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 2) - The Data Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Control Properties and Why to Use Them (part 1) - The Format Properties of a Control
- Microsoft Access 2010 : Form Properties and Why Should You Use Them - Working with the Properties Window
- Microsoft Visio 2013 : Using the Organization Chart Wizard with new data
Technology FAQ
- Is possible to just to use a wireless router to extend wireless access to wireless access points?
- Ruby - Insert Struct to MySql
- how to find my Symantec pcAnywhere serial number
- About direct X / Open GL issue
- How to determine eclipse version?
- What SAN cert Exchange 2010 for UM, OA?
- How do I populate a SQL Express table from Excel file?
- code for express check out with Paypal.
- Problem with Templated User Control
- ShellExecute SW_HIDE
programming4us programming4us